Australia · head to head · updated 2026-08-01
Principle vs Core Practice
AI-forward against cloud-native, both Australian-built. Both are cloud, so the hosting decision is not what separates them.
Principle
Principle Dental
Sydney-built cloud system, and the most AI-forward product in Australian dentistry.
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Entry price
- Not published
- Built for
- Solo, 2–4 locations, Group
Core Practice
Core Practice
Newer Australian cloud platform aimed at growing practices and groups.
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Entry price
- Not published
- Built for
- Solo, 2–4 locations, Group
The short answer
Neither Principle nor Core Practice publishes a price, so any cost comparison between them depends entirely on the quotes you negotiate.
Choose Principle if…
Practices that want AI in the workflow now, from a local vendor, and will negotiate a quote.
It is ahead on native imaging, ai features .
Choose Core Practice if…
Growing Australian practices and small groups that want cloud and modern patient-facing tools.
It is ahead on insurance eligibility, payments, digital forms, analytics & kpis, open api .
Where they actually differ
Of 19 modules we track, these 7 differ. The rest match, so they are not what should decide it.
| Module | Principle | Core Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Native imaging | Built in | Via integration |
| Insurance eligibility | Not stated | Built in |
| Payments | Not stated | Built in |
| Digital forms | Not stated | Built in |
| Analytics & KPIs | Not stated | Built in |
| AI features | Built in | Not stated |
| Open API | Not stated | Via integration |
Show all 19 modules, including where they match
| Module | Principle | Core Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduling | Built in | Built in |
| Clinical charting | Built in | Built in |
| Perio charting | Not stated | Not stated |
| Native imaging | Built in | Via integration |
| Billing | Built in | Built in |
| Claims | Built in | Built in |
| Insurance eligibility | Not stated | Built in |
| Payments | Not stated | Built in |
| Patient messaging | Built in | Built in |
| Online booking | Built in | Built in |
| Digital forms | Not stated | Built in |
| Recall / reactivation | Built in | Built in |
| Analytics & KPIs | Not stated | Built in |
| ePrescribing | Not stated | Not stated |
| Teledentistry | Not stated | Not stated |
| AI features | Built in | Not stated |
| Open API | Not stated | Via integration |
| Multi-location | Built in | Built in |
| Orthodontics | Not stated | Not stated |
Pricing, side by side
Principle
Principle does not publish a price. You have to request a quote, which means you cannot budget or compare before speaking to a salesperson. No figure published; there is an info pack behind a form.
We do not repeat third-party price estimates for quote-only vendors. Several widely republished figures in this category turned out to belong to a different product — see how we compare.
Core Practice
Core Practice does not publish a price. You have to request a quote, which means you cannot budget or compare before speaking to a salesperson. No figure published.
We do not repeat third-party price estimates for quote-only vendors. Several widely republished figures in this category turned out to belong to a different product — see how we compare.
Strengths and trade-offs
Principle
Strengths
- The AI is shipped, not promised: an AI receptionist, a clinical scribe that writes notes in real time, and imaging analysis tied into charting and treatment planning.
- Data is held in Australian data centres on ISO/IEC 27001 infrastructure, encrypted at rest and in transit — a straight answer to the Privacy Act question.
- Australian-built and cloud-native, with gap-filling and automations aimed squarely at the diary problems local practices actually have.
Trade-offs
- No published pricing — the info pack sits behind a form.
- The vendor’s claim to be the only Australian system with a built-in AI receptionist is its own; we have not independently verified it.
- AI clinical features deserve the scrutiny you would give any diagnostic tool. Ask precisely what Clinical Assist does, what it does not, and what regulatory status it holds in Australia.
Core Practice
Strengths
- Cloud-native with the patient-facing layer — booking, forms, messaging — built in rather than bolted on.
- Built for multi-site reporting from the start, which suits a practice planning to grow.
- Modern interface, which matters more than buyers expect for front-desk training time.
Trade-offs
- No published pricing.
- Smallest installed base of the Australian systems here, so the peer network is thin.
- Imaging relies on integration rather than a native module.
Other comparisons
- Praktika vs Core Practice — Two Australian clouds, neither publishing a price
- Dental4Windows vs Core Practice — Desktop heritage against cloud-native
- CareStack vs Core Practice — American all-in-one against Australian cloud